How We
Work

We are building toward a community where more people can participate, contribute, and help shape what happens, instead of everything flowing through one person or one institution.


Shared responsibility.
Clear coordination.
Room to grow.

InitiatED is still taking shape. We are not presenting a finished governance system so much as a direction of travel: away from top-down leadership and toward a community where responsibility, voice, and care can be shared more widely over time.

For now, that means building simple structures that help people participate, contribute, and gradually take on more responsibility as the community grows.

01
Participation over passivity

We want people to help shape the community, not just consume what it offers.

02
Clarity over hierarchy

People need to know how things work, who is handling what, and how to step in when they are ready.

03
Care over extraction

The community should support real people with full lives, not reward whoever can perform the most publicly.

04
Growth over gatekeeping

Leadership, facilitation, and coordination should be things people can grow into, not titles reserved for a few insiders.


Working Groups

Self-organizing · Project-based

Small groups that form around real needs: an awards cycle, a cohort, a project, a resource set, or a practical challenge.

Regional Nodes

Location-based networks

A longer-term possibility for people who want to connect locally while still being part of a wider network.


Process Keepers

Help conversations stay grounded, respectful, and workable when things get hard.

Knowledge Stewards

Help gather resources, keep track of what we are learning, and make useful knowledge easier to find.

External Liaisons

Help represent the work publicly, build relationships, and connect InitiatED to partners, supporters, and funders.

Communications Coordinators

Help keep the communication clear, welcoming, and accessible across the website, messages, and shared platforms.

How decisions are being handled at this stage

Major decisions

Affect the direction of the project

  • Handled with conversation, feedback, and revision rather than announced from above
  • Kept visible enough that more people can understand what is changing and why
  • Treated as revisable while the community and nonprofit structure are still emerging
  • Shaped by what is practical, sustainable, and aligned with the long-term vision

Project decisions

Day-to-day work

  • Made close to the work whenever possible
  • Open to input when they affect other parts of the project
  • Documented clearly enough that others can step in and help over time
  • Used as opportunities to build habits for future shared governance

Urgent decisions

Time-sensitive

  • Handled by the people carrying the work, with consultation when possible
  • Shared afterward with enough context that people understand the reasoning
  • Adjusted if better information or broader participation changes the picture
  • Used to improve the way we coordinate next time

What does this mean in practice?

"Who's in charge?"

Right now, some people are carrying more responsibility than others because the project is still being built. The goal is to widen that circle over time, not keep everything centralized forever.

"Is this already a full cooperative?"

No. It is more accurate to say that InitiatED is moving in that direction. The values are here now; the formal nonprofit and governance structures are still being built.

"Why talk about this before it is finished?"

Because structure shapes culture. We want people to know the project is being built to invite participation, not just to collect attention around one person.

"How do I get involved?"

Join a Signpost Sessions cohort, nominate someone for the Divergent Awards, read the writing, or reach out directly. The best entry point is the one that helps you start a real relationship with the work.